27 December 2011 –
Bumper Sticker Of The Day – If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
I like the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
How one reads this amendment is as powerful a descriptor of one’s culture and politics as any twenty-seven words in the American lexicon. One’s reading of this amendment says more about one’s view of the role of all levels of government in our lives than even the rights ensconced in the First Amendment. If I want to know about someone’s view of him or herself in the scheme of governance, authority, and personal responsibilities, I ask how that person reads the Second Amendment.
Perhaps, I grew up watching too many cowboy westerns. I know that my career in the management of violence and every history book I have ever read have reinforced my contention that when the bad guys ride into town to rob the bank or free their henchman from jail, they face only two kinds of townspeople: those who wring their hands, hide, and leave their peace and security in the hands of the outgunned sheriff; and, me. Can you guess how I read the Second Amendment?
As a challenge to the educated liberals who torture the phrases of any legal statement to admit to uncommitted sins, I include the following rendition of what the Second Amendment means. It is written by Robert A. Levy and William Mellor, authors of the book, The Dirty Dozen, How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom, published in paperback by the Cato Institute in 2009, pages 113-114.
“Correctly interpreted, the main clause of the Second Amendment (“the right
of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”) defines and
secures the right. The subordinate clause (“A well regulated Militia, being
necessary to the security of a free State”) helps explain why we have the right.
Thus, membership in a well-regulated militia is a sufficient but not necessary
condition to the exercise of our right to keep and bear arms. Imagine if the
Second Amendment said, “A well-educated Electorate, being necessary to
self-governance in a free State, the right of the people to keep and read Books,
shall not be infringed.” Surely, no one would suggest that only registered voters
(that is, members of the electorate) would have the right to read. Yet that is
precisely the effect if the Second Amendment is interpreted to apply to members
of a militia….
“Second Amendment protections were not intended for the state but for each
individual against the state—a deterrent to government tyranny. “
Thank you Messrs. Levy and Mellor. You contend rightly that individuals in the United States have the right to bear arms—to own weapons for the protection of free individuals in a free state. But, now I ask, what is free? I refer to Lee Congdon’s book, “Baseball and Memory, Winning, Losing, and the Remembrance of Things Past.” St. Augustine’s Press, 2011, pages 116-117. In this book, Mr. Congdon makes a brilliant point about how the loss of an historical, collective memory has been horrible for our country, and that a collective memory of baseball, particularly the baseball of the 1950s, bound us together as few other things ever could. I agree completely with Mr. Congdon—even though he was cursed by being a Cubs fan and I was blessed by being a Red Sox fan. I have often made the point that life imitates baseball and not the other way around. But, I am moving off today’s point. Mister Congdon eloquently reinforces his thesis in a way that applies strongly to how I think the Founders defined freedom and how we should define it today.
“Those of us who came of age in the 1950s did not invariably turn our thoughts
to the permanent things, but our lives did not revolve around the world of politics
and social protest. We did not look to the federal government to cure our every
ill or to protect us from our own folly. We wanted to be free—this is, morally
responsible—beings….
“Remembering the fifties is not an exercise in nostalgia; it is effort to take stock
of what America once was and what it has now become. It is an opportunity to
stop a moment to reflect upon what has been gained and what has been lost. One
of our greatest losses is of historical memory itself. Without that memory a nation
can never achieve self-knowledge.”
I am convinced the Founders wanted us to be free, morally responsible beings, able and willing to defend ourselves when the outlaw gang come to shoot up the town. Have we deliberately forgotten that? Yes. I think we abandon critical historical continuity because it is hard to be free. It is easier to be ruled than to be morally responsible.
I end with Samuel Adams’s words. I don’t expect to convince any townspeople to come out of hiding , but I do expect to stir real men and women’s blood.
“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say, ‘What
should be the reward of such sacrifices?” Bid us and our posterity bow the
knee, supplicate the friendship, and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the
avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our
blood and hunt us from the face of the earth?
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the
animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels
or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains
sit lightly upon you, and my posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”