26
August 2014 –
A
sad day in Ferguson; a sad day in America.
Monday
was the funeral for 18-year-old Michael Brown, who was shot during a fight with
a policeman on 9 August in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, Missouri. Brown was African-American, as are
two-thirds of this town’s population of 21,000.
The policeman who shot him, 28 year-old Darren Wilson, is white, as are
50 of the 53 policeman on the local force.
Sadly, these facts seem sufficient for many to promote more turmoil
around this tragedy. What is worse,
there appear to be no trustworthy leaders guiding us out of this
maelstrom.
The
dead man’s family and many members of the local community have been solid,
responsible players through these explosive two weeks. Mr. Brown’s father immediately asked for calm
from all who demonstrated in the streets.
The local NAACP also asked for a calm and resolute response to
events. The requests didn’t work. Local police were soon overwhelmed and replaced
by state police and Army National Guard forces.
These parties, government and private, acted, for the most part, with
courage and composure. The rule of law should now play out in an equitable and
just manner, right?
Nope. Contention and disruption arrived almost
immediately in the form of professional
political agitator, Reverend Al Sharpton, who descended upon Ferguson, and with
predictable combative fervor, ranted about police brutality . Juan Williams, a black political commentator,
criticized his antics as “monetizing the civil rights movement.” Sadly, Reverend Sharpton’s eulogy at Mr.
Brown’s funeral continued the agitation; apparently, rather than lead, the
Reverend had some monetizing to finish.
Also
quick on the scene were outside criminals who rioted, looted, and burned
Ferguson. Of the several hundred people
arrested for rampaging and looting since 9 August, fewer than twenty have come
from Ferguson itself. The looting has
recently subsided, probably because it is no longer profitable.
Most
government leaders have responded poorly to the situation. Generally, the higher the level of government,
the more leaders abused the due process of law and abandoned courageous
leadership.
Local
law enforcement’s biggest mistake was the release of a video showing a 6’4” 290
lb. Mr. Brown robbing a convenience store and assaulting a small store clerk
just hours before Brown’s death. That
decision exacerbated unrest and seemed like a deliberate way to influence any
future jury pool. The Ferguson district
attorney did quickly call a grand jury to determine if any charges should be
filed against Officer Wilson, and it is supposed to deliberate until some time
in October. Sadly, however, that extends the time for other political
monetizers to exploit the process.
Soon
after Mr. Brown’s death, Missouri’s Governor Jay Nixon declared a state of
emergency and then cancelled it. His
indecision and political weakness further added to the unrest. Missouri Highway Patrol Captain Ron Johnson was
called to restore security in Ferguson, but the outside criminals continued to
loot. This was probably because Captain
Johnson’s efforts focused on calming the members of the Ferguson community,
most of whom were already obeying the law.
Johnson’s help was indeed needed, but it was applied poorly.
The
scores of FBI agents sent to Ferguson have been professional and
impartial. They have interviewed
witnesses and reviewed local police and legal processes for possible civil
rights violations; they have operated well within federal law. At least they are not the problem.
Unfortunately,
the Department of Justice and President Obama have turned this process on its
head. Attorney General Holder’s personal
appearance in Ferguson troubles anyone looking for an impartial leader who
could convince all parties that civil rights for everyone would be honored fairly. His public account of being a black man
humiliated by bigoted policemen, and his meeting with Mr. Brown’s family to
express his personal regrets, are profound displays of bias that already may
have corrupted the local legal process.
President
Obama also showed disregard for the local Ferguson legal process by sending
three White House emissaries to Mr. Brown’s funeral. The President effectively stamped his
prejudice on the yet-to-be proven contention that Mr. Brown was the victim of
police brutality. Such pandering to specific
support groups should be beneath a president.
Both
the President and his attorney general should stay out of Ferguson. Without comment they should watch while the
facts are established and allow justice to run its course. That is what the leader of all Americans and
his top cop are in office to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment